Mentor Article
Minnesota’s New LLC Act
Our Mentors
Bob Halagan
Halagan Law Firm, LTD.
Roben Hunter
Hunter Advisors, PLLC
Casey A. Mattson
JM+SC Futurity
Gary Sorenson
Insurance Brokers of Minnesota
Kevin Lanigan
Carlson Estate Planning
Sheri Stolp
The Stolp Group
Michael Sherrill
Sherrill Law Offices
Sharon Berglund
Berglund HR Consulting
Mark Hegstrom
Waterfront Financial Group
Suzie Meier
Red Technologies Inc.
Bruce McAlpin
The McAlpin Team
Edina Realty
Shaun Corbin
First Minnesota Bank
Gayle Noakes
Gayle Noakes Supervisor Success
Stacey R. Edwards Jones
Jones Law Office
Roben Hunter, Hunter Advisors, PLLC
Oct 1, 2015
Minnesota’s new statute governing limited liability companies (“LLC”) became effective August 1, 2015. All LLCs that are organized after that date will fall under the new Chapter 322C of the Minnesota Statutes (“New Act”). What does that mean? How does it affect the LLCs already in existence?
The old LLC statute, Chapter 322B, was formulated under a corporate template. It basically looked and functioned a lot like a corporation with a few different names. LLCs had a board of governors that ran the business, similar to a board of directors. The officers were usually called “Managers” but could also be called President, VP and so on. There was formality similar to corporations as well, requiring that its’ Member Control Agreement be in writing.
The New Act is set under more of a partnership template. Typically in a traditional partnership structure there is less formality than there is in a corporation. That is the case under the New Act. For example, the New Act allows for oral agreements of operation, or even implied agreements of operation. The governing agreement under the New Act is called an Operating Agreement, not a Member Control Agreement. Under the old act, the Operating Agreement looked similar to corporate bylaws. Under the New Act, the Operating Agreement would typically discuss all of the governing issues found in the both the old Operating Agreement and the member control agreement, but do so under one document, which, as I said before, can be oral or implied.
Another big shift between the two acts is the management default provisions. Although the old statute permitted member management, the default structure in the statute was for an LLC to be managed by a board of governors. The New Act permits three types of management options: member management, manager management and board management. The default structure in the New Act is member management. Therefore, unless there is an agreement to the contrary, each member has an equal vote in the management of the business for actions falling under its ordinary course of business, even if the ownership is 90% one member and 10% another member. For actions desired to be taken outside the ordinary course of business, the statute default requirement is that all members must consent for such actions.
The final large shift affecting most LLCs that I want to discuss would be that of the default distributions to members. Under the old act, the default was that distributions were allocated in proportion to the value of the members contributions. Under the new act, the default rule would be an equal allocation among members.
As I stated at the beginning, any new LLC that is being formed automatically falls under these provisions. The LLCs formed prior to August 1st do not automatically fall under these provisions…..yet. They may opt in to the new LLC act by an election. However, if they do not elect to be governed under the New Act, beginning January 1, 2018, all LLCs will automatically be subject to the New Act regardless.
The New Act has many other provisions that could make a difference in your LLC under certain circumstances. I would suggest that each Minnesota LLC seek informed counsel to help you determine when it would make sense for your LLC to opt in to the New Act.